🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial move to ban social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, safety advocates, and guardians are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of countries are considering similar measures.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader arguing that phones and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". A law may be enacted soon.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to shield children from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media users. Authorities have suggested that an Australia-style ban remains "a potential options in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has urged lawmakers to enact a bill lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in the Netherlands has recommended parents to block their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding statement demanding a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is granted. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" quality of these apps, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a good starting point," commented a leading European lawmaker behind the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Approach

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a future ban, arguing that "nothing is off the table" but stressing any action must be "based on strong data".

Last year, support gathered behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end weakened. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have expressed warnings. An organization founded by the family of a girl who died after encountering harmful online content argues that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could create a "cliff edge" of harm when teens turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create tools that are appropriate and suitable for children," commented a influential online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, legislation is largely occurring at the state level due to national stalemate.

• Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure barring under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a rule restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with additional access dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted laws mandating parental consent for teenagers to create social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and calls from some figures to follow the Australian lead, a nationwide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Beyond Europe and the US, additional countries are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies adopt a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable young people and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

Even as this global discussion unfolds, the actions of this nation and its followers demonstrate that policymakers around the world are no longer prepared to wait for tech companies to act voluntarily.